When Was Iraq A Better Place?

The Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War of 2003 will now not report its findings until 2016. That, of course, is quite disgraceful. The great and the good who were concerned in promoting the Iraq War desire the war to be treated as history rather than current affairs. The longer the inquiry lasts the less possibility there is of any key people in the decision making ever being called to account for their actions or face any proceedings that justice may require.

At one time the Iraq War used to be justified, after the fact, on the basis that Iraq and the world was a better safer place with Saddam Hussein deposed than it was when Saddam was in power. Twelve years after the war started we can examine that justification and find it is entirely flawed. We see

  • About 100,000 Iraqi civilians died as a result of the war
  • About 6,000 Allied Solders were killed and 35,000 were wounded
  • Virtually every day explosions and politically motivated violence and killings occur in Iraq
  • ISIS are in control of vast parts of Iraq and are beheading and killing people who are not of their brand of religion or who simply disagree with them
  • Extremism has risen as have the number of terrorist incidents related to the views of a certain sect
  • Much of the infrastructure of Iraq has been destroyed
  • There is just as much, if not more, injustice, deprivation and fear now in Iraq as there was under Saddam.

Chilcot’s Inquiry may make no difference to the world and it seems the more obvious it becomes that Iraq was a better place under Saddam the longer it will take Chilcot to conclude his deliberations and publish his report.


4 Responses

  1. True!

  2. Anyone with half a brain knows that the washington mafia wants to control the world’s resources and population.

    Along the way to this goal we are told (via propagandist news) that there is some lawful justification. In fact every mafia style trick is used to achieve that end.

    Fomenting revolution, false flags, bribery/blackmail of politicians, political murdercides, secret weapons, economic embargoes, gold theft, manipulating the stock exchanges, forced debt, drug sales etc etc.

    Control of the middle east oil fields requires the wealth of the Saudi’s and the weapons of the USA.

    In relation to the Chilcot inquiry I am reminded of Sir Humphrey in Yes Prime Minister. Inquiries are not meant to reveal the truth but to hide it.

    I suspect that when the Chilcott inquiry is published it will be couched in vague words and opinions devoid of culprits.

    In passing though, I wonder why Cameron seems complicit. Surely, unless he has a skeleton in his cupboard, he ought to be keen to discredit Blair and the Labour Party especially just before an election.

    • Every successful and powerful nation wants to retain its power by controlling the world’s population and resources. Britain did this, now US, next China.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: