Another Reason For War

I have written much about war and conflict recently. I know that war and conflict is a result of human greed. I wonder whether there is another separate reason for war, one which is unconnected to human desire.

Every modern war brings many deaths; each death means fewer people on the planet, fewer people to spoil it. Each explosion brings more aerosols into the atmosphere, to weaken the heat reach the plant, to dim it and to slow down the rate of climate change.

Perhaps nature has decided that humanity should be controlled and its influence curtailed; this is one way of doing it.

Thus war is nature’s punishment by way of retribution and more importantly by way of reform.

7 Responses

  1. I’ve always seen war as population control – war generally arises from political upheaval right? Societal unrest is most likely due to diminishing resources, there’s just not enough to go around and values increase. Countries freak out, try to grab as much as they can before it runs out – land, resources. People fight and die for these things, until the population lowers enough for there to be enough resources to go around again. Rinse, repeat.
    Thought provoking piece, thank you!

    • Add the word, Redistribution, to the paradigm and one can see how those who control the media, governments and global resources can very easily create havoc where there really is none.

      What is Nemesis.

    • The irony is that there is plenty to go round, but plenty for some is not enough.

  2. Robert
    I just see war as a natural extension of the urge in social primates to contest both territory and resources.

  3. ST ANDREWS, (SCOTLAND), August 28 (RIA Novosti) Mark Hirst – The United Kingdom as a rogue state and a danger to the world, a former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray said.

    “The British Government is deeply, deeply immoral. They don’t care how many people they kill abroad if it advances them. Anybody who votes No [to Scottish independence] is voting to support a pathological state which is a danger in the world, a rogue state and a state prepared to go to war to make a few people wealthy,” Murray said in a speech made ahead of an historic vote on Scottish independence to be held in just three weeks.

    He told an open public meeting in St Andrews that the actions he witnesses as a senior diplomat had changed his “world view” and said it was now “impossible to be proud of the United Kingdom.”

    “I think it is impossible to be proud of the United Kingdom. I think when we invaded Iraq we did to the United Nations what Hitler and Mussolini did to the League of Nations,” Murray added. “I think what we have done since where the truth is often much hidden, if you look at Libya it is a disaster now we bombed it and we killed 15,000 people when NATO bombed Sirte, something they never told you on the BBC. Did we make it better? No,” a diplomat stated.

    “I’ve seen things from the inside and the UK’s foreign interventions are almost always about resources. It is every bit as corrupt as others have indicated. It is not an academic construct, the system stinks,” a former British Ambassador said.

    Murray, who is a member of “English for independence” a group of English born residents living in Scotland who back Scottish independence, said that although he had once been proud to be British, the UK’s involvement in rendition, torture and the invasion of Iraq had altered his allegiance.

    “I was a British diplomat for 20 years. I was always very patriotic to be British and I was very, very proud of it,” he stated.

    “When I first became a British Ambassador and first went out in my own flag car with the Union Jack flying on the front I had a lump in my throat. It was a proud moment for me. It was only six months after that I discovered that in the country where I was Ambassador we and the Americans were shipping people in order for them to be tortured. Some of them were tortured to death,” Murray added.

    “Now as you may imagine, my world view changed,” he added.

    “It was at the same time, a month later, that we invaded Iraq against the will of the Security Council. Not just without the permission of the Security Council but in the full knowledge that if it had gone to the Security Council we would have been voted down,” the former diplomat said.

    “I know for certain – as I used to be head of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office unit that monitored Iraqi weapons of mass destruction – I know for certain that they knew there weren’t any. It wasn’t a mistake, it was a lie,” Murray concluded.

    Former Secretary General of NATO, Lord George Robertson earlier warned Scottish independence would have a “cataclysmic” impact on the world.

    Robertson, a former British MP, told an audience in the United States, that “the loudest cheers for the break-up of Britain would be from our adversaries and from our enemies. For the second military power in the West to shatter this year would be cataclysmic in geopolitical terms.”

    Voters in Scotland will go to the polls on 18th September and will be asked one question, “Should Scotland become an independent country?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: