A Long Shot

The rains are falling as I write. More rain has fallen in much of the United Kingdom  in January than has fallen in any other January for the past one hundred years. I blame climate change but then I would, wouldn’t I? In fact the science can attribute higher rainfall to warmer atmospheres because warmer air holds more moisture than cooler air. I do not think that any part of the United Kingdom suffered from record levels of low rainfall in January. 

Of course, we cannot seriously attribute the floods of a single year (in some parts of England the floods for the past two years) or record droughts and hot temperatures in other parts of the world to rapid climate change, because climate change, as far as we know, will not start galloping until the atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases increase to a certain level, but we do not know the level. It will, many scientists believe, start rapidly changing the climate in many places on our planet.

I should add that some scientists think that the planet will cool down over the next two hundred and fifty years, and although their reasoning fits together, it is founded on greater speculation than that of the climate scientists you think that the earth will warm. If you want to lay a bet against one scenario or the other the cooling scenario will give you much better odds, but betting on the basis of what the odds are is just as foolish as betting.

The rains are still falling.

 

 

3 Responses

  1. What one fails to recognise is.

    A. Much of the flooding we are witnessing today in the villages and the valley’s is down to, the gripping or draining of the hill/fell sides for pasture, they are now filling them back in and planting trees up there, a quick search on Google will show this science to be true.

    B. When we have more clouds it is warmer, when the skies are clear we have frosts, again the science is correct.

    C. Snow and rain/flooding normally follow the cold/frosty periods and clear windows there after.

    D. We have today a science called Geo Engineering, which is creating more clouds, there is enough source documentation around today of this phenomenon, to show TPTB are lying and buggering around with the weather.
    We also have new sciences that say clouds are also created by natural quantum energies from outside and inside the atmosphere, look up HAARP and how it electrifies the clouds, creating more clouds.

    E. Lets look at the Greenland colony issue, where a clear North West passage and a medieval warming period, that science again confirms was the case, of course I would say this wouldn’t I.

    Global warming is a lie, in so much as man is responsible for it all, but is contributing towards it using new science for making money, not the root of all evil, but evils main weapon.

    Some advice, never build houses in a flood plane, the Romans knew about this, lets gain some perspective and move on.

    • let’s look at Greenland. it extends from a latitude of 85 degrees in the north to 60 degrees in the south. 60 degrees is about the same latitude as southern Norway and Sweden and these places are green in summer todau. I doubt if the north of Greenland was anything other than white with snow and ice. “DNA of trees, plants, and insects including butterflies and spiders from beneath the southern Greenland glacier was estimated to date to 450,000 to 900,000 years ago, according to the remnants retrieved from this long-vanished boreal forest. That view contrasts sharply with the prevailing one that a lush forest of this kind could not have existed in Greenland any later than 2.4 million years ago. These DNA samples suggest that the temperature probably reached 10 °C (50 °F) in the summer and −17 °C (1.4 °F) in the winter. They also indicate that during the last interglacial period, 130,000–116,000 years ago, when local temperatures were on average 5 °C (9 °F) higher than now, the glaciers on Greenland did not completely melt away.” says Wikipedia citing its source as a scientific study.

      Whatever the truth about Greenland, it neither proves nor disproves anthropogenic climate change.

  2. Then we need to include precession into the running, latitude is only one parameter Rob, where was Greenland on the particular ecliptic when the Norse were there in, 900’s-1200’s.

    The terrain was not lush forest it was small scrubland and grass to feed their cattle, these cattle were fed on grass, grass only grows above 45 degrees, and needs to do so on a regular basis to continue growth, the greatest threat to the Norse was altering their landscape as the Anasazi did.

    If you watched the Santos Bonacci film I added, in it he explains precession model very well, also the planet has now expanded from the Norse habitation.

    In his book, Collapse, Jarred Diamond explains in detail how the fiords were closed during the winter months, so these people were living in similar conditions to their original homelands in Europe.

    When I began doing my legal studies I was told never to rely on anything with a wiki link, I wonder why that is Rob, lol.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: