Transaction Taxes

The European Commission has proposed a transaction tax. It is a modest proposal which sets a tax on transfers of shares and bonds of 0.1% payable by the buyer and a tax on derivatives of 0.01%. It is intended to encourage what the commission calls more responsible trading and it should make speculation less attractive.

The United Kingdom already has a de facto transaction tax on share transfers of 0.5%, which is called stamp duty. The United Kingdom is one of the 16 member states that will not support the transaction tax and will not implement it. The remaining 11 member states of the EU will support the transaction tax. It is significant that Luxembourg opposed the transaction tax, presumably desperate to avoid any tax which might discourage institutions to use Luxembourg as a centre for financial speculation.

Much of today’s economic woes have been caused be reckless speculation. Buying stocks shares and bonds as an investment is an economic necessity. People need to have somewhere in which to save their earnings and provide for their pensions and that place should be safe and secure. There is an enormous difference between speculation and saving. It is not aa distinction that our tax systems recognise.

We need such a system to apply to all trades all over the world. One type of trade that such a tax would have an impact upon is the system of high frequency trading in stocks and shares. Using super computers some traders (perhaps to call them traders is to insult genuine merchants) places an order and then cancels the order within .001 seconds. The trader places many of these orders, which he then cancels; the cancellation congests the market giving the trader a few microsecons advantage. According to research ( 95% of these orders are cancelled almost immediately after they have been placed.

A transaction tax would make such operations uneconomic and may well bring stability to the process of investing in stocks, shares and bonds. Today there is great distrust among savers. It is hard to know which investments are safe. Even keeping money in the bank is a risky business. The banks have failed once and we cannot be sure whether they have simply papered over the cracks in the structure of fixed the structure itself. Today our savings have the quality of Hardy’s wistful lady.

And once I saw her beckoning with her hand

As I came into sight

At an upper window. And I at last went out;

But when I reached where she had seemed to stand,

And wandered up and down and searched about,

I found she had vanished quite.

Fears have been expressed that the eleven nations that will adopt these transaction taxes will lose out in that their banks will relocate to parts of the EU where there will be no transaction tax. Perhaps. But perhaps those nations will find other ways of preventing such a tax being circumvented by avoidance.

2 Responses

  1. The trouble with taxes, all taxes is the extra effort that is claimed at the top, the very bottom has to work harder to supply the interest and the ultimate looser is our fragile enviornment.

    The one with the most to gain from not wanting such a policy/tax and the most to loose if they do agree are the ones in overal control of the monetary sytems. Margarit Kennedy has come up with the best sitution when she put forward the parking fee for hoarding cash, this would create a geater flow of money in circulation at any given moment.

    Her policy is also frowned upon because it would prevent the richest in control in partig with theirs or should I say everyone elses labour in the form of physical wealth, and prevent the devide currently deepening.

    If one takes a look at how much physical energy and how much physical cash is in circulation, one has the two sides recieving the most unfair levels of what gets put in and what is being prevented from working for everyone, that level is 3% cash in pockets and 1% with the most of what is left.

    However the world is waking up to this fraud and the largest and inhumane act against humanity, with millions of people being destroyed by this diosease.

    The best way to protect ones assets and immediate enviornment, is to cease parting with your labour for anything less than the largest sum that any profiteer recieves, this would create the isolation starvation that is needed to stop the crimes.

  2. Enjoy, note the time limit mentioned.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: