Good at Boasting Bad at Emission Reduction

The government of the United Kingdom have boasted that in the past twenty years the UK has cut its emissions of greenhouse gases by 25%. The government is very good at boasting boasters are invariably liars. The government has form when it comes to boasting about the environment and its measures on greenhouse gas reduction. It boasted that the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme would reduce emissions. It has done nothing of the kind, with the price of carbon (a commodity that no one want) being at levels throughout the EU ETS operation which would not entice a major polluter to find ways of reducing its pollution. It has boasted for five years to have the world’s first Renewable Heat Incentive. In fact the RHI is still in the design stage for its most important aspect and has been promised “next year” for each of the past five years. The latest date promised is March 2014, but I do not believe that promise.

Of course emissions actually produced in the UK have fallen since 1992. About twenty of the UK’s power stations that burn coal have closed from 1992 onwards and have been replaced with natural gas, which produced about 35% fewer emissions per kWh of electricity produced. Some of our heavy industry has closed since 1992, and that causes there to be less demand on energy and therefore fewer emissions. Fewer goods that are bought by consumers are made in the United Kingdom; the mass garment manufacturing industry has been virtually decimated since 1992; garments are imported from foreign parts these days.

Goods made abroad and consumed in the UK produce emissions, often far more emissions than if they were made in the UK because, for example, goods made in China are usually made with power that comes from coal, that heavy emission producer. When these “embedded emissions” are taken into account it is thought by the Climate Change Committee, independent, (a statutory body established under the Climate Change Act 2008 is to advise the UK Government and Devolved Administrations on emissions targets and report to Parliament on progress made in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and preparing for climate change) that emissions have actually increased by 10% since 1992, which makes sense having regard to the largely ineffectual climate change measures that the government has taken since 1992.

A more telling statistic would be the emission production since 2010; these are actually increasing ( see https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/175659/ghg_national_statistics_release_2012_provisional.pdf) according the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s statistics. That is the most damning evidence of the failure of climate change measures by the United Kingdom.

We cannot blame China or India for emissions they produce to our order. The overall emission statistics is what really counts; we are one world with one atmosphere and the sooner the UK government recognises this unpalatable fact the better. Boasting will not help us fight our rapidly changing climate.

4 Responses

  1. “…the price of carbon (a commodity that no one want)…”

    ‘No one’?

    I would be very happy to pay more for what I consume, if such additional cost reflected the true cost to the biosphere for my intrusion into it, and if the additional charge were guaranteed to be spent on reducing my intrusion and safeguarding the future. (I tried to avoid the word ‘tax’ because too many people have a knee-jerk negative reaction to that.)

    As for the rest of your post:

    • You don’t want the commodity, you want to limit the existence of the commodity in the atmosphere, and I fully agree with your sentiments.
      Robert

    • Ah, I misunderstood. Sorry! :)

  2. Everyone take a look around your home and about your person, and what does one see, then what does that make us all, no different than if the goods were made by our hands.

    These goods are coming into the country at an alarming rate, the companies who are bringing them in are paying next to no (taxes), so what are they doing with all the unpaid leverages, I can tell you they are not making the enviornment any safer nor cleaner, only creating situations where their model will deepen the cause.

    Pot calling kettle black would have been a better title, while the planet swims in real poullution, that is killing millions as we speak.

    Corporate + Greed = Dissaster for everyone supporting it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 320 other followers

%d bloggers like this: