Update on Energy

Readers of these pages will know that for years I have been arguing that the United Kingdom’s energy policy is little more than a collection of words and ideas, rather than a real policy. It has tended to revolve around the generation of electricity, rather than understanding that heat is at least as important as electricity. We tend to worry that the lights will go out, rather than the fire going out. Today there are rumours that energy policy is going to be put on a more rational basis, but I am not too excited about the rumours.

There are some signs that at least some aspects of energy policy will be better addressed than before. There are plans to build new gas fired generating stations, probably in the expectation that shale gas deposits will be exploited. If these are built and coal burning power stations decommissioned it will make a massive saving in greenhouse gas emissions and pollution. That is good news.

Coal may have a place in the energy policy of the future but should only be used when smoke washing and carbon capture technologies are fully developed. Smoke washing, which reduces pollution from coal burning considerably, is a developed but expensive technology. At the moment governments across the world think that the pollution and emissions from coal, which considerably add to the pace of climate change and which damage the health of millions, are a small price to pay for relatively cheap electricity.

Carbon capture and storage is a consummation devoutly to be wished, and no more than that. Taken together they may end up not even reducing pollution and emissions at all, because present the effect of using these devices will almost certainly mean that more coal is need to generate power than simply burning in a relatively uncontrolled way; what we gain on the swings we will lose on the roundabouts.

DEF, which operates Hunterson B nuclear power station in Ayrshire, has announced that it will extend the life of the power station, which was due to be closed in 2011, until 2023. The power station is an important source of energy for Scotland, and although this does not herald a new nuclear dawn, it is probably the way that many nuclear power stations will go, by extending the life of technology that was new in the mid 1970s but today is rather old fashioned.

Nevertheless needs must when the devil drives, and the devil driving this particular vehicle is the almost indiscriminate consumption of energy that we have now. In the 1970s energy bills were high but consumption was much lower, with fewer homes having central heating and much less demand on electricity usage.

Our progress has taken us to a place where we have become addicted to energy, and like all addictions it is a dangerous state of mind.

2 Responses

  1. I don’t think most people are addicted to energy consumption, rather they have become remote from its creation and its use is governed by little on-off switches rather than pyhsical manipulation of heavy levers.

    For example, take railways.

    From the beginning of railways up to 40 years ago, a large and powerful engine pulled coaches. It was hard work for driver and fireman. It was quite obvious to passengers how it all worked and how coal burnt to make heat to make steam from water which drove pistons and walschaerts gear to move wheels to pull coaches. There was noise and steam and smoke.

    Now with diesel or electric motors distributed along coaches it all seems to work by magic. Press a button and the train moves.

    If we were more physically involved in the energy creation and deployment we might use it more sparingly.

  2. This was a contradiction of terms in many ways, today we are wasting more than we ever did before. Local power stations used to use the residual heat to warm vast greenhouses and heat homes for many miles around.
    All the households in the country leave every white goods and electical devices on stand by, here is a wealth of power being wasted and achieving nothing whatsoever.
    People will only stop wasting energy when they are no longer able to get into debt to obtain it.
    There could be so much cheap energy for the masses if the whole enegry sector was nationalised, rivers everywhere could have water powered 24-7 instead of useless windmills.
    Does anyone know that the total contribution of the entire wind gererating paradigm contributed less that 0.01% towards their upkeep and the end users, when will we wake up to the sheer fraud being paid for by you and I, beggers belief.

    On my 5 mile dog walk tonight, there used to be 16 mills in less than half that distance along the river bank, all producing a plethora of goods from the same energy, non of which was wasted.

    We have gone backwards not forwards, by 2020 we might see the results of our waste and lazy slavery model.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 329 other followers

%d bloggers like this: