Already it has started. First the rumours of an energy price increase have gathered momentum. Although most energy companies have rules out an increase for the rest of this year, unless you have fixed your energy price, expect a swinging increase in gas and electricity bills from January onwards. There are probably several reasons why you should expect a price increase.
- Natural gas prices remain linked to oil prices and as the world come out of recession demand for natural gas and oil will increase. Most of the UK’s electricity is generated by natural gas. Most of the UK’s heating is provided by natural gas.
- Natural gas remains a regionally priced commodity whereas oil is an internally price commodity. Most of the UK’s natural gas comes from European sources, as natural gas production in the North Sea declines.
- As with any regionally priced commodity prices are high when demand is high and low when demand is low. Demand is always higher in winter, and there is still very little natural gas storage in the UK. We and the energy companies therefore los the opportunity to buy and store natural gas in summer when the prices are low.
- We have been reducing the “spare” electrical generating capacity for many years. If we are to avoid the possibility of power cuts we ought to have a “spare” capacity of around 50%, so as to cover for a very cold long winter. At the moment we have about 14% spare capacity and OFGEM, the regulator, expects this to fall to 4% in 2015.
- We have closed our coal burning power stations rather quickly, and although OFGEM appears to blame EU legislation for this, the truth is that the UK has been rightly closing coal burning power stations for years. What the government have not done is to build sufficient new power stations. I know that many think that governments in the UK do not build power stations – that is the job of the generating companies – but in truth the generating companies will only build power stations if they receive huge government subsidies. The government has very little tax payers’ money left and therefore no there are no subsidies as one by one the generating companies refuse to take the commercial risks of building new nuclear power plants.
- There has been insufficient investment in energy saving; the energy we require each year will be significantly less in terms of that required for space heat if we required all buildings to be properly insulated.
- Investment in renewable energy has been, so far, in the wrong kind of renewable energy. We have wasted much money on wind farms and photovoltaic panels which produces little effective energy saving because electricity cannot be stored but have not spent anything on solar water heating, a simple and effective technology where the energy created can be stored until it is need.
All of these factors will mean that energy – both heat and electrical – will come in increasingly short supply, which creates a perfect situation for the energy companies who can all raise their prices for something that we need and cannot generally buy elsewhere except in the case of solar water heating, where we can but the power plant and install it on our roofs.
The taxpayer will pay in higher energy prices and will risk power cuts in very cold weather, because successive governments’ failure to develop a sensible energy policy.
Filed under: carbon dioxide, carbon emissions, climate change, electricity, energy, global warming, solar, solar energy, solar panels Tagged: | energy policy, future energy price movements UK, natural gas, north sea oil, ofgem
All true except
‘We have closed our coal burning power stations rather quickly, and although OFGEM appears to blame EU legislation for this, the truth is that the UK has been rightly closing coal burning power stations for years.’
Surely any sensible government would not ‘close’ coal fired power stations but have a programme of ‘replacement’
EU dictats say we must not keep them running despite having 300 years of coal. In my view that is economic warfare by the Brussels elite. They are sentencing many UK industries and people to a slow death in the years to come. Perhaps so that Germany will have no competition to be the manufacturing zone of USE.
Not only has the fuel, but food and many of the biggest monocrop producers been bagged, governments are now endebted to the same groups, rather like the “Prince Bishops” of yesteryear, they have control but not ultimate control of the people, or the money like the “Princely Printers”, the land and food are still there for the taking, if you get digging, until such time, legislation prevents such sustinance, as we are witnessing in the United States of late.
The ready energy in coal is a secure pot, one that CAN be reached at any time using older technology, nuclear, gas, are near infinates, but will be used after overall control is established, leaving the oil for military controls of the guided there after.
Solar is not a singular alternate, and can be used as a levering point to gain avenues of your labour through debts, and then legislation of a European controller could change the rules and down from the roof they would come, remember they would have the power over an alternative energy that looses them points over power, it would never happen I hear some saying, I would say. Never say never.