Hurricane Irene changed, as hurricanes do, into Tropical Storm Irene. It started in the Leeward Islands, passed through the Eastern part of the United States and ended up in Canada, moving at speeds from eighty miles an hour to fifty miles a hour. Get used to hurricanes and storms becoming more frequent; they are a sign of the times. (more…)
It is good to be able to report some positive news about the environment. There is not much of it around. However the news that British rivers were at their healthiest and least polluted for more than twenty years is good reason to celebrate. (more…)
Filed under: climate change, global warming, pollution | Tagged: accidental leakage, cleaning up rivers, hemical fertilisers, news about the environment, river pollution, rivers, stomach pump, Thames, Wandle | Leave a Comment »
I always feel sadness when the August Bank holiday comes round. The summer is passing and the holiday marks its passing. The evenings are slowly but surely drawing in and the fruits and grains that were made in spring and grown in summer are almost ripe. Most mornings are misty, but the mist often banished as the sun comes up. The evenings are damp and there is dew on the grass. It is a sad time but we had a good summer even if the sun did not shine every day, summer was light on our bodies, opening our doors. Summer is almost gone, and the winter is coming on.
When I was young salmon was a luxury and cheese a stable. Today salmon is cheap and cheese expensive. The reason why salmon is cheap today is the advent of salmon farming, carried out in many countries in the world. Millions of salmon are farmed, that is to say kept in pens which are quite an unnatural habitat for a fish which has developed a life cycle involving swimming thousands of miles. (more…)
From little acorns might oaks grow and from tiny aerosol particles large clouds form, or so we thought. Little acorns still produce oak trees but recent research has cast doubt on our understanding of cloud formation. (more…)
It must have seemed like a good idea at the time. Having been fiercely criticised for its handing out of sing use plastic bags the international supermarket chain Tesco came up with a bright idea; they would make their familiar free plastic bags biodegradable.
Simple. They would add small amounts of metal to the plastic which they use to make up the bags. The bags would then break down in the presence of oxygen and daylight and hooray, Tesco would save the planet. The bags (known as oxo biodegradable bags) went into product more than eighteen months ago and Tesco virtuously handed out them at the rate of two billion a year.
Good intentions are not enough to save the environment. Things are rather complex and you cannot rely on a bright idea without thinking it through properly and doing the research otherwise you run the risk of your bright idea causing more harm than it mends. We do rush into things, without thinking them through; that is why we have wind turbines that generate electricity intermittently, over subsidised photovoltaic panels and low energy light bulbs that may end up creating atmospheric mercury without creating that much light.
Having produced their biodegradable bags with a flourish of publicity, Tesco left it to others to study the real environmental impact of their bags. In this case DEFRA (theUK’s Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) organised the study appointingLoughboroughUniversityto study and report on them.
You can read the report at http://wales.gov.uk/docs/desh/publications/100602wasteoxydegradableen.pdf . It concludes that the bags do break down more quickly provided they are exposed to ultra violet light and oxygen, but the breakdown does not take eighteen months but somewhere between two and five years before the bags degrade to small fragments. However, they only degrade to small fragments, and do not degrade into substances that can be mixed with compost; in fact mixing the bags with compost (that you might be tempted to do with a biodegradable bag) will adversely affect the quality of the compost.
The researchers are not sure what the environmental effect of plastic fragments in the soil will be on animals that eat it. There is no evidence that it is harmful, but no evidence that it is not harmful. Further the bags are difficult to recycle with under plastics. This makes the bags unlikely to be recycled or if mixed with other normal plastic waste makes the recycling harder.
The metal additive made the bags weaker and made them unsuitable for being reused; you would more likely throw them away where they would not degrade because when the bags are used in landfill (as most of them are) they will not degrade at all; there is no ultraviolet light underground.
Of their decision to take the biodegradable oxo biodegradable plastic bags out of use Tesco said
“We took the decision to remove the biodegradable additive because we believed it contributed towards bags becoming weaker and to help better promote their re-use and recycling at end-of-life. This decision was underpinned by a detailed review of the science to help us understand the full life-cycle environmental impacts of our carrier bags.”
It is a shame that Tesco did not themselves commission and pay for the research before they put this type of bag into the environment. They did not look before they leapt. You are supposed to to that so that you know the consequences of your action but as with so many corporate decisions the consequences of leaping do not affect the company as much as they affect the environment. Looking before they leap is costly for companies like Tesco whose actions have great and adverse effect upon the environment. The problem is that the consequences of their actions, their leap, affect us more than them. It is not a case of looking before they leap but looking before they push us.
Just over a year ago I went to see my local MP. His name is Mike Freer and he is a conservative Member of Parliament for Finchley and Golders Green. He had just been elected as a first time MP having served Barnet Council previously. (more…)
Filed under: carbon dioxide, carbon emissions, climate change, global warming, Renewable Heat Incentive | Tagged: Chris Huhne, cyorus, Cyprus, cyprus problem, greg barker, mike freer, mp, RHI | 1 Comment »
There is always a debate about climate change. Sometimes the debate is loud and vigorous. At other times the debate is hard to hear above the alarums and excursions that are part of our lives in a rapidly changing economic world. There are two separate questions to the climate change debate. Traditionally these two questions are expressed simply for mass consumption in the press, radio and television as:-
- Is the climate changing at all?
- If it is changing what are the causes of the change? (more…)
Filed under: climate change, climate change deniers, global warming | Tagged: evolution, evolution and climate change, key climate change questions, movement of species, shifting species | Leave a Comment »
Regular readers will know that I am one who believes that rapid climate change is a great danger to humanity, and that rapid climate change is created by the actions of humanity. They will also know that I am in favour of clean renewable energy, but not all renewable energy is clean and not all renewable energy does what it says on the tin. (more…)
Filed under: climate change, electricity, energy, global warming, PV, Renewable Heat Incentive, renewables, solar, solar energy, solar panels, weather | Tagged: feed in tarrifs, Mis selling Photovoltaic Solar | 1 Comment »
Regulators are supposed to regulate. In the case if energy companies the regulator is OFGEM and it has power to investigate so that regulation may be effective. In the past few months the energy companies in theUnited Kingdom, being in effect six retail suppliers of gas and electricity, have announced very large price increases, approaching twenty percent. (more…)